Table of Contents
Abstract
This paper studies subsampling-based ridge ensembles in the proportional asymptotics regime, in which the feature size grows proportionally with the sample size. By analyzing the squared prediction risk of ridge ensembles as a function of explicit ridge penalty $\lambda$ and the limiting subsample aspect ratio $\phi_s$, we characterize contours in the $(\lambda, \phi_s)$-plane at any achievable risk. As a consequence, we prove that the risk of the optimal full ridgeless ensemble (fitted on all possible subsamples) matches that of the optimal ridge predictor. Additionally, we prove strong uniform consistency of generalized cross-validation (GCV) over the subsample sizes for estimating the prediction risk of ridge ensembles. This allows for GCV-based tuning of full ridgeless ensembles without sample splitting and yields a predictor whose risk matches that of the optimal ridge predictor.
Code
The code for reproducing results of this paper is available at Github.
Scripts
- Section 2 Figure 1
run_gcv_the_equiv.pycomputes the theoretical GCV and risk asymptotics for plotting.
- Section 3.1 Figure 2
run_gcv_the.pycomputes theoretical GCV asymptotics.run_gcv_estimate.pycomputes empirical GCV estimates.
- Section 3.2 Figure 3
run_gcv_opt.pycomputes the empirical risk of large ridgeless ensemble.run_gcv_the_lam.pycomputes the theoretical risk of optimal ridge predictors.
- Section 3.2 Figure 4 GCV for general M
run_gcv_correct_est.pycomputes empirical GCV estimates.run_gcv_correct_the.pycomputes theoretical curves.
- Section 4 Figure 5
convert_data.Rconvertspbmc_multimodal.h5seuratobtained from Seurat topbmc_count.h5.df_split.csvsplits training and test sets.run_gcv_real_data.py
- Functions for runing the experiments:
compute_risk.pyfits models, obtains estimates, and computes the risks.fixed_point_sol.pycomputes quantities related to the fixed-point equations.generate_data.pygenerate simulated isotopic and non-isotopic data.